您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库! | 皮书网首页
登录|注册 |无障碍阅读
国家知识资源服务中心 CARSI
您现在所在的位置:首页 > 书籍

中国社会心理学评论 第11辑

书 名: 中国社会心理学评论 第11辑
英 文 名: Chinese Social Psychological Review (Vol.11)
作 者:  杨宜音 童辉杰刘力王俊秀
I S B N: 978-7-5097-9999-4
关 键 词:  社会心理学 跨文化心理 心理测量 文化变量多样性 中国人心理症状
出版日期: 2016-12-01

中文摘要

研究和认识生活在中国文化中的人们的社会心理,发现和揭示民族文化和社会心理相互建构的过程及其特性,最终服务社会、贡献人类,这正是华人社会心理学者百年来孜孜以求的目标。《中国社会心理学评论》继承了这一传统,发表有关华人、华人社会、华人文化的社会心理学原创性研究成果,以展示华人社会心理学的多重视角及最新进展。

心理测量从来就不仅仅是一系列数学模型与算法,它的所有历程都将与文化发生“纠缠”。由于中国文化与西方文化殊异,在研究中国人的心理与行为时,更需要使用心理测量这一工具,去探索并开辟新的研究领域。本辑《中国社会心理评论》是对近年来我国关于文化心理与测量议题的一次检阅、展示与总结。所收论文涉及的领域较广,从道家人格的测量,到中国人心理障碍的文化意义阐释;从中国人思维方式与特点的剖析,到中国社会腐败现象的研究;从中国人集体主义特点的评估,到中国人阶层意识的解剖;从对中国文化心理的测量与解析,到关于对中国文化心理测量的理论与方法的宏论,可谓精彩纷呈。

<<
>>

文章列表

CommonID:DIR_18089045,ID:8089045,SiteID:14,Type:formerAidText,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213010,name:中国社会心理学评论编辑委员会,ShortName:null,SubName:null,EnTitle:null,EnShortTitle:null,EnSubTitle:null,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:null,AbstractEN:null,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:null,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:8089046,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:Y,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:null,XmlID:null,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:16:29.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:0,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:0,DownCount:0,AuthorInfos:null,BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:中国社会心理学评论编辑委员会,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:中国社会心理学评论编辑委员会,_RowNo:1
CommonID:DIR_18089047,ID:8089047,SiteID:14,Type:formerAidText,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213011,name:主编简介,ShortName:null,SubName:null,EnTitle:null,EnShortTitle:null,EnSubTitle:null,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:null,AbstractEN:null,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:null,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:8089048,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:Y,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:null,XmlID:null,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:16:29.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:0,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:0,DownCount:0,AuthorInfos:null,BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:主编简介,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:主编简介,_RowNo:2
CommonID:DIR_18089049,ID:8089049,SiteID:14,Type:formerAidText,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213012,name:本辑特约主编简介,ShortName:null,SubName:null,EnTitle:null,EnShortTitle:null,EnSubTitle:null,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:null,AbstractEN:null,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:null,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:8089050,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:Y,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:null,XmlID:null,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:16:29.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:0,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:0,DownCount:0,AuthorInfos:null,BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:本辑特约主编简介,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:本辑特约主编简介,_RowNo:3
CommonID:DIR_18089051,ID:14775666,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213013,name:心理测量与文化:回顾与反思,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:Measurement of Psychology and Culture:Retrospection and Reflection,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:心理测量从来就不仅仅是一系列数学模型与算法,它与文化如影相随,如胶似漆。心理测量不同于物理测量,物理测量多为直接测量,其对象多可直接观测;心理测量的对象则多为难以直接观测的心理现象,所以只能是间接测量。作为一种间接测量,心理测量从一开始就要建构概念、抽取行为样本、建立常模等,所有这些历程都将与文化发生“纠缠”。当对所要测量的对象建构概念时,必然涉及文化价值与文化背景。,AbstractEN:,KeyWords:352643,55929,218321,129889,404682,EKeyWords:404679,57040,404683,129891,404684,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:8089052,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120161201X20161057001_000_001,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:16:29.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:5,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:8089053,DownCount:1,AuthorInfos:{"童辉杰":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:心理测量与文化:回顾与反思(卷首语),ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:心理测量与文化:回顾与反思(卷首语),_RowNo:4
CommonID:DIR_18089062,ID:14775667,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213014,name:中国人心理症状的诠释:多限制特征假说,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:Annotation of Chinese Psychological Symptoms:Multi-constraint Characteristic Hypothesis,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:

对中国人的心理症状进行了探索与诠释。对3个不同的样本(1890人的SCL-90测验的成人样本,951人的PDRS测验的成人样本,2654人的PDRS测验的大学生样本)进行因素分析,并与国外研究进行比较。研究发现,中国人样本因素分析呈现比较稳定的结果,其中人际困扰、躯体化、自杀风险和网络成瘾为贡献率最大的因素。对为何中国人样本四大症状成为最重要的因子进行了讨论和诠释,提出中国及东方的金字塔文化假说,认为其特征是多限制与超稳态,与西方的球体文化明显不同。多限制特征假说可以贴切地解释中国人的心理症状的文化意义。

,AbstractEN:

To explore and annotate Chinese psychological symptoms,three different samples(1890 adults were tested by SCL-90,951 adults and 2654 undergraduates were tested by PDRS)were analyzed by Exploratory Factor Analysis(EFA). Comparing with the overseas studies,the EFA outcomes of Chinese samples presented a stable state. Interpersonal relationship problem,body symptom,suicidal risk and internet addiction made the primary contribution. The reason why these four symptoms became the most important factors was discussed and interpreted. Chinese and oriental pyramid culture hypothesis was further proposed too. According to this hypothesis,Chinese and oriental culture was multi-constraint and ultra-steady-state,which was significantly different from the western spheroid culture. Multi-constraint characteristic hypothesis could be appropriately explained the cultural significance of Chinese psychological symptoms.

,KeyWords:352625,352629,352626,352628,58349,EKeyWords:352630,352634,404685,404686,48596,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:8089063,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120161201X20161057001_000_002,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:16:32.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:5,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:8089064,DownCount:1,AuthorInfos:{"童辉杰":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"tonehg@163.com","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:童辉杰,苏州大学应用心理学研究所,教授,博士生导师。

"},"Tone Huijie":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:中国人心理症状的诠释:多限制特征假说,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:中国人心理症状的诠释:多限制特征假说,_RowNo:5
CommonID:DIR_18089095,ID:8089095,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213015,name:道家人格量表题项版的编制与反思11727045,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:Development of Taoism Personality Item Version Scale and its Rethought,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:

基于文化影响人格的视角,结合对道家人性论的分析,建构道家人格结构理论模型,本文将道家人格操作化界定为:道家人格指在道家思想文化的影响下,与道家人性论之“自然本真”的内涵一致并表现在知-情-意-行层面的典型的人格特质。以此为基础,从道家经典著作中选取486个描述人的词语,经由多次意义分析和初测,保留了37个,并最终形成了道家人格量表题项(初测)版,包括自然、本真、柔韧、谦退、超脱和寡欲6个因子。验证性因素分析(样本2)支持了该六维结构。道家人格量表题项版内部一致性系数和重测信度系数分别介于0.430~0.704和0.528~0.721,各题项与其所属维度间的相关(绝对值)及各维度间的相关(绝对值)分别介于0.389~0.795和0.157~0.444。研究反思认为,特质因素论与(道家)人性整合观间的矛盾影响了道家人格量表题项版的效度,这使得任何对道家人格量表题项版有效性的考查,都不能以因素分析得到的单一因子为单位,而应以整合道家人性观及道家知-情-意-行心理行为特征的层级模式为单位。情境(判断)测验能够有效契合针对中国人文化心理行为特征的测量,但情境(判断)测验的效度以及中西情境(判断)测验的比较等问题仍有待进一步探究。未来研究需要立足现时中国社会的实际、收集更多质性资料、深入探究道家人格各维度的丰富内涵并编制具有针对性的道家认知思维方式量表。

,AbstractEN:

In view of the perspective of human nature-psychology-behavior influenced by Taoism ideology and culture,and each personality theory inherently includes some kind of thoughts about human nature,the authors discussed the operational definition about what is Taoism Personality:influenced by traditional Taoism ideology and culture,the Taoism Personality includes many traits reflecting on the cognitive,emotion/feeling,willness and behavior which are congruent with the nature of Taoism. Based on the theory analysis,the authors picked 486 words describing people’s personality from the classical Taoism books,finally remain 37 words by meaning analysis and pretest with several times,and also develop the original version of Taoism Personality Item Scale with a six dimensions’ structure(including ZiRan,BenZhen,RouRen,QianTui,ChaoTuo and GuaYu)which is supported by the following the Confirmatory Factor Analysis(CFA). The reliability coefficient(α)and test-retest reliability of the all Taoism Personality Item Version dimensions respectively distribute from 0.430 to 0.704 and from 0.528 to 0.721. The correlations of items-dimensions and dimensions-dimensions respectively(absolute value)distribute from 0.389 to 0.795 and from 0.157 to 0.444. The authors rethought the results and point out:(1)there is a conflict to a certain degree between trait theory with factor analysis method and Taoism integrating human nature,which may be detrimental to the validity of the Item Version Scale.(2)in order to understand the Taoism Personality,it is necessary to apply the integration unit(not the dimension unit)with the level feature of the cognitive emotion willness behavior.(3)while Situational Judgment Test may be appropriate to as a tool to measure the Tradition Chinese culture features,its validity still remains open. The future research including:exploring the richer meaning of the dimensions of the Taoism Personality Scale by collecting richer qualitative data;development of the Taoism Scale of Way of Thought.

,KeyWords:404687,318453,103930,404688,404689,EKeyWords:404690,391797,103933,404691,404692,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:8089096,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120161201X20161057001_000_003,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:16:43.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:5,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:8089097,DownCount:4,AuthorInfos:{"涂阳军":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

涂阳军,湖南大学教育科学研究院副研究员、硕士生导师。

"},"郭永玉":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

郭永玉,华中师范大学心理学暨青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室教授、博士生导师。

"},"Tu Yangjun":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Guo Yongyu":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:道家人格量表题项版的编制与反思,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:道家人格量表题项版的编制与反思,_RowNo:6
CommonID:DIR_18089125,ID:8089125,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213016,name:中国人整体思维方式量表的编制与确认11727050,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:Chinese Thinking Styles:Their Concept and Structure,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:

关于东西方思维方式差异的研究是近20年来文化心理学关注的热点问题。这些研究不仅有助于人们理解东西方人行为表现的差异,而且能够帮助人们更好地处理文化冲突,以正确的态度对待中国文化发展过程中出现的西化问题,并进一步促进东西方文化的交流和人们之间的相互理解。

本研究采取本土心理学的研究方法,以中国传统的辩证思维观念为理论基础,并以Nisbett和彭凯平等人的相关研究结果为材料,从理论和实践两方面深入探究了中国人思维方式的结构,并在此基础上编制出了中国人整体思维方式量表。通过对2800名被试数据的分析,总结出了中国人整体思维方式的三维结构:联系性、变化性和矛盾性。其中联系性和矛盾性两个维度与辩证思维的研究一致,而变化性和其他两个维度呈负相关,这与人们日常观念和相关理论并不一致。本文还对中国人整体思维方式做了验证性因素分析,分析得出的结构模型信效度良好,表明这一测量工具适合于对中国人的研究。

本研究结果对于理解中国人思维方式的特点及影响有重要意义:随着心理学对东西方文化研究的不断加深,对思维方式的影响也将越来越大,弄清楚思维方式影响中国人心理和行为的机制,将是未来这方面研究的主要课题。

,AbstractEN:

Debates on the differences between the Eastern and the Western thinking styles have been a focus among culture-psychologists over the recent years. Comprehension of such differences will certainly be conducive to the interpretation of the behavioral distinctions between the Easterner and the Westerner. What’s more important,investigation on such debates will enable us to better dispose of cultural conflicts and the questions of Westernization during the process of cultural development,and will even further improve our cognition of the developments of Eastern and the Western science. This research adopts indigenous approaches and has implemented the fieldwork among the Chinese and within the context of Chinese culture. Theoretically,on the basis of related research made by psychologists such as Nisbett and Peng,the present one probes into the structure of the Chinese thinking style.

The structure of the Chinese thinking style is set up through the statistical analysis on 2800 subjects. This structure consists of three dimensions:relation,change,and contradiction. Relation and contradiction,two important dimensions of the Chinese dialectical thinking style,confirm the former researchers’ explanation for the differences between the Eastern and the Western thinking styles. However,the change dimension is inconsistent with people’s daily concepts and relevant theories. The style illustrated by the structure has revealed that change and the other two dimensions are negatively related and thus the previous understanding of dialectical concepts needs revision. Change,contradiction,and relation bear no convergent consistency but have consistency with self-identity. In this way,the Eastern and the Western thinking styles have both differences and commonness. The structure is confirmed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis,and the reliability and validity of the investigative forms turn out to be high as well. This investigation result is of great significance in understanding the characteristics of the Chinese thinking styles. It is reasonable to believe that with more and more efforts in the investigation on the influence of different cultural backgrounds on thinking styles,the domain of thinking styles’ impact will surely be further confirmed,the deep-level mechanism will be clearly figured out and a communication bridge between the Easterner and the Westerner will definitely be spanned.

,KeyWords:350303,404693,395449,404694,EKeyWords:404695,404696,395451,404697,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:8089126,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120161201X20161057001_000_004,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:17:01.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:35,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:8089127,DownCount:7,AuthorInfos:{"侯玉波":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"houyubo@pku.edu.cn","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:侯玉波,北京大学心理学系教授,博士生导师。

"},"彭凯平":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:彭凯平,清华大学心理学系教授,博士生导师。

"},"朱滢":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:朱滢,北京大学心理学系教授,博士生导师。

"},"Hou Yubo":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Peng Kaiping":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Zhu Ying":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:中国人整体思维方式量表的编制与确认,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:中国人整体思维方式量表的编制与确认,_RowNo:7
CommonID:DIR_18089174,ID:14775668,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213017,name:中华文化背景中的审辩式思维能力测量,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:Critical Thinking Assessment in Chinese Cultural Background,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:

今天,国际教育界已经形成共识:教育最重要的任务之一是发展学生的审辩式思维(critical thinking)。审辩式思维是最值得期许的、最核心的教育成果。国际教育领域中谈论最多的话题之一是怎样发展学生的审辩式思维,“审辩”成为使用频率最高的教育词汇之一。审辩式思维是创新型人才最重要的心理特征。在教育中如果重视发展学生的审辩式思维,可以使学习成为一个探索和发现的过程,而不再是一个记忆和复制的过程。审辩式思维能力不同于分析性推理(analytic reasoning)能力。审辩式思维可以作为一个学习的指挥棒,我们需要开发审辩式思维能力测试,考查一个人能否理解做出不同决策所依赖的不同前提条件和假设,能否理解决策者对所做决策所应该承担的责任。审辩式思维不是“大批判思维”,而是接受多种价值并存的可能性,在坚持自己的真理的同时也包容别人的真理。审辩式思维植根于中国古代传统文化。如果说西方文化的突出优势表现在形式逻辑和分析性推理,那么,东方文化的突出优势则表现为非形式逻辑和审辩式思维。对东方文化中审辩式思维的再发现,意义不仅局限于中国创新性人才的培养,也不仅局限于中华文化的重建,而且可能拓宽人类的未来发展道路,增大人类在这个星球上长期存活的可能性。

,AbstractEN:

Critical thinking is closely related to the creativity of a person and is one of the most important key competences in modern society. The development of students’ critical thinking is an essential goal in modern schools. For the development of students’ critical thinking we have to make some change in learning,change learning from a process of remembering some specific knowledge to a process of exploring and finding. Development and administration of critical thinking tests(CTT)will prompt the critical thinking development in education. This paper introduced the efforts in developing CTT in China and discussed the critical thinking elements embedded in Chinese cultural background.

,KeyWords:352642,349906,404698,404699,EKeyWords:352645,404700,404701,404702,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:8089175,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120161201X20161057001_000_005,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:17:19.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:3,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:8089176,DownCount:1,AuthorInfos:{"谢小庆":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"xiexq@blcu.edu.cn","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者;谢小庆,北京语言大学,教育测量研究所所长,中国教育学会统计测量分会副理事长,研究员。

"},"Xie Xiaoqing":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:中华文化背景中的审辩式思维能力测量,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:中华文化背景中的审辩式思维能力测量,_RowNo:8
CommonID:DIR_18089194,ID:8089194,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213018,name:基于客观指标的中国人集体主义量表11727051,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:China’s Collectivism Scale by Objective Indicator,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:

个体主义/集体主义的测量一直是社会和文化心理学研究者关心的问题。本文以中国政府公布的客观数据为基础,采用Vandello和Cohen编制策略制作了中国人的集体主义量表,结果发现包括自我雇佣的百分比、离婚率、独居的百分比、65岁以上老人独居的百分比和三代同堂的百分比5个客观指标的集体主义量表可以描述中国人集体主义的地区差异,该量表有较好的信度和效度。未来可以用它来进行集体主义的地区差异和代际变迁的研究。

,AbstractEN:

How to measure individualism/collectivism is very important and full of controversies for social and cultural psychology. Based on the public statistics data of China government,we made up the China’s collectivism scale by objective indicators. China’s collectivism scale showed reasonable reliability and criteria validity which includes divorice rate and percentage of self-employment and percentage of living alone and percentage of elderly people(aged 65+ years)live alone and percentage of household with grandchildren in them. It can be used to explore the within-cultural difference and trans-generational change of collectivism in China in future.

,KeyWords:352646,404703,404704,58119,404705,EKeyWords:352649,404706,404707,71493,404708,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:8089195,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120161201X20161057001_000_006,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:17:26.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:27,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:8089196,DownCount:8,AuthorInfos:{"侯东霞":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

侯东霞,中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室研究生。

"},"任孝鹏":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"renxp@psych.ac.cn","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:任孝鹏,中国科学院心理研究所副研究员。

"},"张凤":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

张凤,北京林业大学人文社会学院本科生。

"},"Hou Dongxia":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Ren Xiaopeng":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Zhang Feng":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:基于客观指标的中国人集体主义量表,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:基于客观指标的中国人集体主义量表,_RowNo:9
CommonID:DIR_18089220,ID:8089220,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213019,name:城乡居民阶层意识的归属与偏移:以甘肃省为例11727052,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:The Ascription and Deviation of Urban and Rural Residents’ Stratum Consciousness:A Mental Survey Based on Gansu Province,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:

社会阶层意识是居于某一社会阶层中的个体对社会阶层的认知与认同。依据社会阶层意识的操作性定义,所编制并得到验证的《城乡居民社会阶层意识问卷》共有6个维度:社会分层的感受与评价、划分社会阶层的标准、社会各阶层的基本认知、自我阶层归属、本阶层及其他阶层的感受与评价、阶层关系的感受与评价。其中,前3个维度称为阶层认知,后3个维度称为阶层认同。对城乡居民的社会阶层意识状况进行问卷调查后发现:①城乡居民具有较为清晰的阶层认知和较为明确的阶层认同,社会阶层意识较强;②城乡居民的阶层认知和阶层认同之间具有交互影响,共同作用于阶层冲突;③阶层认同对城乡居民的客观社会位置与阶层认知起着调节作用,从而影响着阶层意识的形成与发展;④城乡居民自我认同的阶层与客观阶层的一致性不高,自我阶层归属感弱;⑤城乡居民对社会阶层关系的评价较为乐观,认为当下社会各阶层之间的关系较为和谐。

,AbstractEN:

The study on stratum consciousness is not only a hot topic among all circles such as educational circle but also a great strategic project concerning the structure of the stratum theory,the rebuilding of people’s mentality and the construction of a harmonious society. Through analyzing theoretically,it is found that stratum consciousness is the cognition and identification of stratum of an individual in one specific stratum. “The questionnaire about local urban and rural residents’ stratum consciousness” is based on the operational definition of stratum cognition and identification. It has six dimensions in total:the feeling and assessment of the social stratification,the standard of dividing the stratum,the basic cognition of each stratum,the self class ascription,the feeling and assessment about your own class and other classes and the feeling and assessment about the stratum relation. Among them,the former three dimensions are together called stratum cognition and the next three stratum identification. In the way of interviewing,questionnaire survey,mathematical statistics and so forth,the case of urban and rural residents’ stratum consciousness in Gansu province were analyzed. The study turns out that:①Urban and rural residents have clear stratum cognition and specific stratum identification. They have strong stratum consciousness.②Urban and rural residents’ stratum cognition and identification have interaction and they together influence people’s stratum conflicts.③Between urban and rural residents’ objective social class and stratum cognition,stratum identification play the role of regulating and then affect the formation and development of stratum consciousness.④Urban and rural residents have low consistency between self-identified class and objective class and self class have low ascription.⑤Urban and rural residents have positive attitudes towards stratum relation. In other words,they think,nowadays,the stratum relation is harmonious. There’s no so-called conflicts that cannot be solved.

,KeyWords:404709,352651,404710,180515,EKeyWords:404711,404712,404713,404714,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:8089221,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120161201X20161057001_000_007,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:17:34.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:6,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:8089222,DownCount:4,AuthorInfos:{"崔诣晨":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

崔诣晨,南京林业大学江苏环境与发展研究中心副教授,上海师范大学心理学博士。

"},"常江潇":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

常江潇,南京大学社会学院硕士。

"},"侯静":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

侯静,西北师范大学心理学硕士。

"},"王沛":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

王沛,上海师范大学教育学院教授、博士生导师。

"},"Cui Yichen":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Chang Jiangxiao":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Hou Jing":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Wang Pei":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:城乡居民阶层意识的归属与偏移:以甘肃省为例,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:城乡居民阶层意识的归属与偏移:以甘肃省为例,_RowNo:10
CommonID:DIR_18089284,ID:8089284,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213020,name:跨界民族大学生国家认同的内容及其测量11727053,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:The Content and its Measurement of National Identity in Cross-border Ethnicity,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:

本研究采用质性分析和问卷调查的研究方法,以新疆地区的跨界民族(维吾尔族和哈萨克族)大学生群体为对象,编制出符合我国特点的跨界民族国家认同问卷,对跨界民族国家认同现状进行调查并分析。研究结果显示,跨界民族大学生的国家认同内容包含文化认同和公民认同,且其更多关注公民认同内容。跨界民族大学生国家认同总体水平较高。维吾尔族和哈萨克族大学生的文化认同和公民认同差异不显著,维吾尔族和哈萨克族大学生的文化认同均显著高于公民认同。来自纯本民族居住地区和与少数民族杂居地区的跨界民族大学生的文化认同均显著低于来自与汉族杂居地区的跨界民族大学生。跨界民族的文化认同越高,其与符号行为有关的活动越多;公民认同越高,其与功能行为有关的活动越多。

,AbstractEN:

Through the qualitative analysis and the questionnaire survey,this study designed the questionnaire of in accordance with Chinese characteristics,and then investigated 419 cross-border ethnic undergraduates in Xinjiang(Uygur and Kazak). Results showed that national identity of cross-border ethnic college students’ included cultural identity and citizen identity,and they paid more attention to citizen identity. The undergraduates of Cross-border ethnicity hold higher national identity. The difference of cultural identity and citizen identity between Uygur and Kazak was not significant,the cultural identity of Uygur and Kazak were significantly higher than citizen identity. The cultural identity of cross-border ethnic undergraduates who lived in mono-ethnic area or mixed minority areas is lower than who lived with Han. The undergraduates who hold higher cultural identity of the cross-border played more symbol behaviors,the undergraduates who hold higher citizen identity played more functional behaviors.

,KeyWords:49355,75056,90267,404715,404716,EKeyWords:352656,51059,112781,404717,404718,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:8089285,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120161201X20161057001_000_008,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:17:57.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:24,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:8089286,DownCount:7,AuthorInfos:{"于海涛":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"psyhtyu@gmail.com","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:于海涛,石河子大学师范学院心理系副教授。

"},"李嘉诚":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:李嘉诚,北京师范大学心理学院研究生。

"},"张靓颖":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:张靓颖,上海交通大学研究生。

"},"Yu Haitao":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Li Jiacheng":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Zhang Jingying":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:跨界民族大学生国家认同的内容及其测量,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:跨界民族大学生国家认同的内容及其测量,_RowNo:11
CommonID:DIR_18089387,ID:8089387,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213022,name:正义动机研究的测量偏差问题:关于中国人世道正义观(公正世界信念)的元分析11727054,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:Sample Bias,Self-reference,and Context Effects in Justice Motive Research:A Meta-analysis of Belief in a Just World among Chinese,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:

早期关于正义动机的研究多以西方、受良好教育、工业化、富有、民主社会(western,educated,industrialized,rich,and democratic,WEIRD)的被试(特别是中产阶级家庭的大学生群体)为样本,并以个人主义、集体主义作为文化区分的理论基础,发现西方人表达个人正义动机多从独立的自我参照视角出发,相信自己生活在一个好有好报、恶有恶报的美好世界;而中国人表达正义动机却从互依或他人参照视角出发,认为社会整体是一个好有好报、恶有恶报的和谐世界。近年来,主流学者开始意识到这样的研究存在重大的取样偏差或自我偏差、情境偏差,其揭示的人类行为特征(WEIRD)也是奇怪的。本文利用元分析技术,对36个中国样本(N=8396)的个人世道正义观(自我参照)与一般世道正义观(他人参照)的相关系数和均值差进行效果值检验。结果发现,个人世道正义观与一般世道正义观之间存在强正相关(r=0.64,Fisher’s Z=0.75),平均数差异显著,但效果值很小(d=0.20);进一步的调节变量分析发现,只有在非学生样本、弱势情境下(如生活逆境),被试的个人世道正义观得分才显著低于一般世道正义观,即认为“自己委屈、他人应得”。总之,中国人的正义动机呈现低自我参照、高情境区分的特点,并非“独立”或“互依”就能简单概括的。

,AbstractEN:

Previous research,on basis of Western,educated,industrialized,rich,and democratic(WEIRD)participants,often revealed a weird profile of human nature. Taking justice motive as an example,the independent and self-refereed Western findings show that individuals hold a higher personal over general belief in a just world(BJW,in which good people get rewarded and bad people get punished),while the interdependent and other-refereed Chinese hold a higher general over personal BJW. However,more and more scholars realized that these previous studies suffering from sample bias,self bias,or context bias. Using the meta-analytic technique,the current study compared the personal and general BJW(s)through 36 Chinese samples(n=8396). The results showed that the personal BJW was positively related to general BJW(r=.64,Fisher’ s Z=.75),and personal BJW was significantly lower than general BJW,with a small effect size(d=.20). Further moderation analyses exhibited that the standard difference in mean scores of personal and general BJW(s)was bigger in the non-college(US. College)samples and under the disadvantaged(US. ordinary)contexts. Taken together,the results show a low self-reference and high context effect of justice motive among Chinese,which offers new insights into the field of justice motive where the pattern in alternative cultures remains unclear.

,KeyWords:188259,404724,352665,352664,404725,EKeyWords:404726,404727,352668,404728,404729,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:8089388,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120161201X20161057001_000_010,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:18:06.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:7,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:8089389,DownCount:4,AuthorInfos:{"吴胜涛":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"michaelstwu@xmu.eud.cn","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:吴胜涛,厦门大学传播研究所传播与社会研究中心副教授。

"},"潘小佳":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:潘小佳,厦门大学硕士研究生。

"},"王平":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:王平,中国科学院心理研究所硕士研究生。

"},"加百利·诺德曼":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:加百利·诺德曼,马堡大学心理系,博士后。

"},"李会杰":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"lihj@psych.ac.cn","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:李会杰,中国科学院行为科学重点实验室(中国科学院心理研究所)副研究员。

"},"Wu Shengtao":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Pan Xiaojia":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Wang Ping":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Gabriel Nudelman":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Li Huijie":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:正义动机研究的测量偏差问题:关于中国人世道正义观(公正世界信念)的元分析,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:正义动机研究的测量偏差问题:关于中国人世道正义观(公正世界信念)的元分析,_RowNo:12
CommonID:DIR_18089430,ID:8089430,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213023,name:文化视角下的腐败心理研究:概念、指标和测量11727055,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:The Definitions,Indicators and Measures of Corruption:A Cultural Perspective,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:

近年来,腐败心理与行为正在逐渐成为多学科共同关注的前沿问题。文化视角的腐败心理研究引起了越来越多的学者的关注。本文力图从腐败现象的概念、指标和测量工具的发展演变三个方面梳理文化与腐败的相关研究成果。腐败的定义繁多,一般理解为一种滥用公共权力谋取私利的行为。由于腐败行为的隐蔽性,目前难以在研究中直接观测腐败行为,往往通过一些替代性指标来揭示腐败,比如腐败感知与腐败容忍度、腐败经验、腐败意向以及行为模拟等。在测量工具方面,自陈量表、情景测试等方法在不同腐败指标的测量中得到了广泛的应用。博弈范式和大数据方法可以为未来文化视角下的腐败研究提供新的视角和测量手段。

,AbstractEN:

For the past few years,corruption has become one of most critical forefront issues,and more and more psychologists have drawn their attention to research on culture and corruption. The present article attempts to review the definitions,indicators and measures of corruption from the perspective of culture. There are several definitions of corruption. “Misuse of the public power” is generally accepted. Because of the concealment of corruption,some proxy indicators were often employed to reflect and represent corruption reality,such as corruption perception,corruption experience,attitudes towards corruption,corrupt intention,and so on. Various self-report measures and scenarios were developed to explore the relationship between culture and corruption indicators. The game theory and big data technology are two potential orientation to interpret culture and corruption.

,KeyWords:122222,404730,404731,302627,404732,EKeyWords:177355,404733,404734,45453,404735,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:8089431,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120161201X20161057001_000_011,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:18:08.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:15,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:8089432,DownCount:5,AuthorInfos:{"谭旭运":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"tanxuyun@mail.bnu.edu.cn","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:谭旭运,心理学博士,中国社会科学院社会学研究所博士后。

"},"梁媛":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:梁媛,北京师范大学心理学院。

"},"顾子贝":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

通信作者:顾子贝,北京师范大学心理学院。

"},"Tan Xuyun":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Liang Yuan":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Gu Zibei":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:文化视角下的腐败心理研究:概念、指标和测量,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:文化视角下的腐败心理研究:概念、指标和测量,_RowNo:13
CommonID:DIR_18089456,ID:8089456,SiteID:14,Type:backAidText,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:213024,name:《中国社会心理学评论》投稿须知,ShortName:null,SubName:null,EnTitle:null,EnShortTitle:null,EnSubTitle:null,Level:0,BookId:8089041,AbstractCH:null,AbstractEN:null,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:null,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:8089457,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:Y,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:null,XmlID:null,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:admin,AddTime:2017-03-03 17:18:08.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 22:02:06.0,HitCount:0,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:0,DownCount:0,AuthorInfos:null,BookPublishDate:2016-12-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:《中国社会心理学评论》投稿须知,ISBN:978-7-5097-9999-4,BookTitle:中国社会心理学评论 第11辑,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:《中国社会心理学评论》投稿须知,_RowNo:14
相关图书
引文
×