您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库! | 皮书网首页
登录|注册 |无障碍阅读
国家知识资源服务中心 CARSI
您现在所在的位置:首页 > 书籍

International Security Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017

书 名: International Security Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017
英 文 名: 国际安全研究.2017年.第1辑
作 者: TAOJian
I S B N: 978-7-5201-0911-6
关 键 词:  国家安全 研究 世界 英文
出版日期: 2017-06-01

中文摘要

<<
>>

文章列表

CommonID:DIR_50523270,ID:9434966,SiteID:14,Type:formerAidText,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:342467,name:Editorial Let’s Focus on Global Security Governance,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:null,EnShortTitle:null,EnSubTitle:null,Level:0,BookId:9434932,AbstractCH:null,AbstractEN:null,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:null,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:9434964,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:Y,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:null,XmlID:null,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2018-02-11 08:41:29.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2018-02-11 09:12:47.0,HitCount:0,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:0,DownCount:0,AuthorInfos:null,BookPublishDate:2017-06-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:Editorial Let’s Focus on Global Security Governance,ISBN:978-7-5201-0911-6,BookTitle:International Security Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017,BookStatus:6,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:Editorial Let’s Focus on Global Security Governance,_RowNo:1
CommonID:DIR_50523271,ID:9434975,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:342468,name:The Future of Regional Security Governance: Towards an Asian Concert of Powers50367422,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:9434932,AbstractCH:,AbstractEN:

This paper initiates the concept of “Asian Concert of Powers” and expounds on its necessity and long-term significance in relation to the future of Asia and security governance in the Pacific region. The idea of a concert of powers, in its earliest form, was theorized and practiced in 19th century Europe, nonetheless, a general theory on the concert of major powers (not necessarily the biggest powers) is still applicable to 21st century Asia (and the Pacific region), where serious security challenges and dilemmas may potentially escalate to confrontations and even conflicts among major powers. More importantly, an Asia Concert is bound to prevent war, safeguard long-term peace and in still vigor to the regional economy. In other words, if an Asia Concert were to be established and managed smartly and effectively, by 2079, the Asia-Pacific region would’ve enjoyed a hundred years’ peace, similar to the one in Europe from 1815 to 1914. Since 1979, peace has prevailed for nearly 40 years in Asia. The regional and trans-regional forums, meetings, organizations and institutions developed over the past two decades or more represent the intentions and efforts to manage the power transition in the region and can be treated as the foundation for a future Asian Concert, despite their overlapping, mutually-incompatible and sometimes-competing nature. The US, with its alliance system, remains in the leading position in the regional security governance of Asia, but the country has since grown to recognize the complexity of regionalism in security issues. Many suggest the US should in the future resort to the theory of Asian Concert in its approach with China, which has made at remendous contribution towards a peaceful Asia on the basis of economic development. In response to US “Pivot to Asia” China proposes to establish a New Type of Major Power Relations with the US, and it is going to play a central and key role in Asia Concert.

,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:398113,398114,39036,398115,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:9434969,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120170601X20173421001_000_001,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2018-02-11 08:41:29.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2018-02-11 09:12:47.0,HitCount:2,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:9434977,DownCount:4,AuthorInfos:{"PANG Zhongying":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

Pang Zhongying, Professor at School of International Studies, Renmin University and Specially-invited \u201CQianjiang Scholar\u201D at Zhejiang Normal University.

"}},BookPublishDate:2017-06-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:Future of Regional Security Governance: Towards an Asian Concert of Powers,ISBN:978-7-5201-0911-6,BookTitle:International Security Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017,BookStatus:6,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:Future of Regional Security Governance: Towards an Asian Concert of Powers,_RowNo:2
CommonID:DIR_50523286,ID:9434989,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:342469,name:The “Chinese Dragon” and the “Indian Elephant” Standing Shoulder to Shoulder: China-India Non-traditional Security Cooperation50367449,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:9434932,AbstractCH:,AbstractEN:

In recent years, with non-traditional security cooperation being a new focus of attention in the realm of international relations, there is a growing interest among IR scholars to analyze the increasingly prominent challenges of non-traditional security like terrorism, financial crisis, transnational organized crime, pandemic diseases, climate change, illegal immigration and refugee crisis, compound natural disasters, depletion of natural resources and trans-boundary conflicts for resources. These challenges pose a grave threat to regional security, including that of East Asia and South Asia. China and India, two large neighboring countries, are enjoying their growing prominence and global influence in the 21st century. From the perspective of traditional security the core problem that bothers China-India relations is the protracted territorial disputes. However, if their relationship and bilateral cooperation is examined in terms of nontraditional security, the cooperation and exchanges between the two countries have grown rapidly since the turn of the century. The challenges of economic security, energy security, anti-separatism, anti-terrorism, water resource security, pandemic diseases, maritime security, and ecological security, are causes of concerns in both China and India. These areas comprise priorities for cooperation in non-traditional security between the two countries. It is posited that the theoretical paradigm of “peace-cooperativism” and the “pluralistic win-win” pattern of collaboration provide an important framework for China-India non-traditional security cooperation, thus opening up new possibilities and prospects for further development of the two countries.

,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:79420,398116,8906,398117,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:9434980,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120170601X20173421001_000_002,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2018-02-11 08:41:29.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2018-02-11 09:12:47.0,HitCount:13,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:9434991,DownCount:4,AuthorInfos:{"YU Xiaofeng":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

Yu Xiaofeng, Professor of School of Public Affairs, Director of Center for Nontraditional Security and Peaceful Development, Zhejiang University.

"},"Ruth Kattumuri":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

Ruth Kattumuri, Co-Director, India Observatory, London School of Economics and Political Science.

"}},BookPublishDate:2017-06-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:“Chinese Dragon” and the “Indian Elephant” Standing Shoulder to Shoulder: China-India Non-traditional Security Cooperation,ISBN:978-7-5201-0911-6,BookTitle:International Security Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017,BookStatus:6,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:“Chinese Dragon” and the “Indian Elephant” Standing Shoulder to Shoulder: China-India Non-traditional Security Cooperation,_RowNo:3
CommonID:DIR_50523303,ID:9435003,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:342470,name:Power Transition and China-US Security Dilemma in a Nexus of “Same Bed Different Dreams” and “Riding-Tiger” Conundrums,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:9434932,AbstractCH:,AbstractEN:

The main objective of this paper is to provide a framework for understanding and interpreting the current China-US security conflicts in geopolitics and geoeconomics. The methodological approach by the paper intends to go beyond the rationalities and assumptions of both conventional IR theories and traditional theories of international political economy (IPE) and international development studies (IDS) to situate and anticipate a shift I hegemony. The authors find a heuristic value of the two Chinese idiomatic proverbs - “same bed, different dreams” and “riding-tiger dilemma”50367566–which suggests an analytical exploration of both the material/structural dilemma (the common bed of a global setting upon which China-US relations were founded is changing) and the ideational dilemma (different dreams and expectations under which each side wishes the bilateral relationship to develop towards anticipated outcomes). These two intertwined dilemmas are meanwhile generating persistent and unstable conundrums in China-US relations - a riding-tiger phenomenon - a mutually most important and indispensable relationship (tiger) which presently lacks any effective way to resolve any bi- or multi-lateral differences or predicaments.

The paper is structured in the following way: after the conceptual and theoretical discussions on the changes of power relations between China and the US seen from the perspectives of power transition theory, realism, liberalism and world system theory, and onto IPT and hegemonic shift, the paper starts to uncover the transformations of IR in general and IPE in particular since the China-US rapprochement, and especially since the post-Cold War globalization and transnational capitalism that have fundamentally changed the “bed” (foundation) of China-US bilateral relations. Then, the paper goes on exploring and interpreting their respective “dreams” (anticipation and perceptions) in order to understand their ideational “false consciousness” in their respective expectations of what their relationship should be. After that, the authors analyze these differences and the intended/unintended consequences that reflect the current security confrontations between the two countries. Finally, the authors’ analytical findings to the paper’s research question are summarized in the last conclusion section.

,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:39036,398118,77412,5458,398119,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:9434997,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120170601X20173421001_000_003,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2018-02-11 08:41:29.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2018-02-11 09:12:47.0,HitCount:2,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:9435005,DownCount:4,AuthorInfos:{"LI Xing":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

Li Xing, Professor and Director, Research Center on Development and International Relations, Aalborg University, Denmark.

"},"Timothy M. Shaw":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

Timothy M. Shaw, Professor, University of Massachusetts Boston.

"}},BookPublishDate:2017-06-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:Power Transition and China-US Security Dilemma in a Nexus of “Same Bed Different Dreams” and “Riding-Tiger” Conundrums,ISBN:978-7-5201-0911-6,BookTitle:International Security Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017,BookStatus:6,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:Power Transition and China-US Security Dilemma in a Nexus of “Same Bed Different Dreams” and “Riding-Tiger” Conundrums,_RowNo:4
CommonID:DIR_50523322,ID:9435015,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:342471,name:Consensus Politics and Its International Strategic Effects: A Theoretical Investigation50367567,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:9434932,AbstractCH:,AbstractEN:

Consensus is a key concept in IR research and practice. In theory, consensus is regarded as a basic condition or hypothesis for cooperation in both international cooperation theories and strategic theories; in practice, consensus is a cardinal diplomatic goal to be pursued, fulfilled and consolidated. Based on the inter-subjective analysis of consensus, international consensus can be categorized as authentic versus partial/fake consensus, and negative versus positive consensus. According to the hierarchical analysis of consensus, consensus-building is a fundamental condition for international cooperation as well as a pivotal means for conflict resolution. While partial/fake consensus can contribute to international cooperation, it can also result in the escalation of international conflicts under certain circumstances. The key issues of the theoretical analysis of the international strategic effects of consensus include the role of partial/fake consensus in international cooperation and conflicts as well as the conflict effects of negative consensus. Based on the multi-level analysis of consensus types, the study of consensus from the perspective of international strategic psychology consists of the effect analysis of cooperation and conflicts. The paper reconstructs the logic between consensus and international cooperation as well as international conflicts, which is crucial for the recognition of different types of consensus in international relations.

,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:132350,31374,176880,398120,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:9435009,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120170601X20173421001_000_004,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2018-02-11 08:41:30.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2018-02-11 09:12:47.0,HitCount:2,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:9435018,DownCount:4,AuthorInfos:{"YIN Jiwu":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

YinJiwu, Professor, School of International Relations and Diplomacy, Beijing Foreign Studies University; Senior Fellow, Research Center for Public Diplomacy, Beijing Foreign Studies University.

"}},BookPublishDate:2017-06-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:Consensus Politics and Its International Strategic Effects: A Theoretical Investigation,ISBN:978-7-5201-0911-6,BookTitle:International Security Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017,BookStatus:6,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:Consensus Politics and Its International Strategic Effects: A Theoretical Investigation,_RowNo:5
CommonID:DIR_50523337,ID:9435031,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:342472,name:On Separatism and State Recognition,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:9434932,AbstractCH:,AbstractEN:

The study of state recognition is an issue easily overlooked in the field of international relations. In recent years, however, with clamors for separation and secession running rife and rampant and conflicts and confrontations aroused by state recognition of separatist entities intensified, it is imperative to research the relationship between separatism and state recognition. In international politics, state recognition refers to the recognition and acceptance of a political actor as a new sovereign state by other states. The basic principles of state recognition are well established in international law but whether or not a state grants state recognition to a new member especially a separatist entity mainly depends on its own interests, which inevitably leads to disagreements and disputes in the practice of state recognition. Therefore, for a state confronted with challenges from separatism, it is highly necessary to formulate and implement a “counter-recognition strategy” to crush separatist conspiracies in its fight against separatism. Indeed, before separatism has developed to the extent of “establishing a state,” the state concerned should take effective governance measures to contain the growth of separatism, seek ways for political reconciliation and guard against the intervention of external forces.

,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:134032,108009,398121,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:9435025,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120170601X20173421001_000_005,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2018-02-11 08:41:30.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2018-02-11 09:12:47.0,HitCount:2,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:9435033,DownCount:4,AuthorInfos:{"LI Jie":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

Li Jie, Associate Professor, Institute for Central Asian Studies, Lanzhou University.

"}},BookPublishDate:2017-06-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:Separatism and State Recognition,ISBN:978-7-5201-0911-6,BookTitle:International Security Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017,BookStatus:6,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:Separatism and State Recognition,_RowNo:6
CommonID:DIR_50523358,ID:9435043,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:342473,name:Security Concepts and Climate Change: ASEAN Perceptions and Policies50367675,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:9434932,AbstractCH:,AbstractEN:

Southeast Asia is one of the region’s most vulnerable places to climate change. As the only organization of regional integration in Southeast Asia, ASEAN’s approaches to, and policies towards, climate change have in recent years received more and more attention. As a complement to the interpretation based on the physical conditions and capacity, discussion of the impact of the concept throws new light on ASEAN’s perception of climate change-related security and its policies in this regard. The author argues that as ASEAN is faced with a high risk of climate change due to its geographic exposure and socio-economic vulnerability, ASEAN’s perception of these risks would be defined not only by constraints of physical conditions but also by the notion of comprehensive security. Accordingly, ASEAN’s perception of climate change-related security and its approaches demonstrate three characteristics, that is, sustainable development, comprehensive approaches that involve multiple areas and pluralistic participation in efforts to cope with climate change. The article also suggests that though currently, the concept of comprehensive security dominates ASEAN’s perception of security with the state as the center of concern, subtle changes in its perceptions of, and its approaches to, climate change are taking place as the notion of human security has steadily gained impetus.

,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:22950,398122,87619,4851,398123,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:9435036,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120170601X20173421001_000_006,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2018-02-11 08:41:31.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2018-02-11 09:12:47.0,HitCount:8,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:9435046,DownCount:4,AuthorInfos:{"JI Ling":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

Ji Ling, Deputy Director of The Institute of Asian Studies, China Foreign Affairs University; Research Fellow of Collaborative Innovation Center for Territorial Sovereignty and Maritime Rights.

"}},BookPublishDate:2017-06-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:Security Concepts and Climate Change: ASEAN Perceptions and Policies,ISBN:978-7-5201-0911-6,BookTitle:International Security Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017,BookStatus:6,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:Security Concepts and Climate Change: ASEAN Perceptions and Policies,_RowNo:7
CommonID:DIR_50523367,ID:9435058,SiteID:14,Type:chapter,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:342474,name:On the Evolution of the Arctic Route Geo-Security Structure,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:,EnShortTitle:,EnSubTitle:,Level:0,BookId:9434932,AbstractCH:,AbstractEN:

With global warming and the Arctic ice melting, the opening of the Arctic route across the board is fast approaching. The Arctic route becomes a new arena for resources competition and geopolitical scramble for more power, and its geo-security problems will also become more prominent. Arctic route geo-security expands the scope of the Arctic regional security by providing a safeguard for the Arctic geo-security and offering other Arctic countries a point of entry into the Arctic geo-security. The Arctic route geo-security mainly refers to the Arctic route geopolitical relations of all countries involved in their pursuit of rights and interests of the Arctic routes and the solutions to the associated security problems. The Arctic route geo-security, with political and military security as its focus, is closely related to the geo-political and geo-economic security, and is the frontier for the struggle of the maritime rights and interests. If not properly handled, the Arctic route geo-security can cause vast damage. Under the influence of such factors as the international coordination mechanism, the existing international legal framework, the behavioral patterns of big powers, and the ready availability of the Arctic route, the Arctic geo-security will witness great gaming between multiple blocs. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a corresponding safety specification and coordination mechanism. The existing mechanism for the Arctic routes is not conducive to the tackling of issues related to the current Arctic route geo-security situation. This paper suggests that a “general Arctic mechanism” should be established to meet the needs of the Arctic route geo-security for maintaining the stability in the region.

,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:398124,394210,398125,398126,398127,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:9435051,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120170601X20173421001_000_007,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2018-02-11 08:41:31.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2018-02-11 09:12:47.0,HitCount:2,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:9435060,DownCount:4,AuthorInfos:{"LI Zhenfu":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

Li Zhenfu, Director and Professor, Research Center on Polar Marine, College of Transportation Management, Dalian Maritime University.

"},"LIU Tongchao":{"Address":"","Affiliation":"","Email":"","Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"

Liu Tongchao, Ph.D. Candidate, Dalian Maritime University.

"}},BookPublishDate:2017-06-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:the Evolution of the Arctic Route Geo-Security Structure,ISBN:978-7-5201-0911-6,BookTitle:International Security Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017,BookStatus:6,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:the Evolution of the Arctic Route Geo-Security Structure,_RowNo:8
CommonID:DIR_50523401,ID:9435070,SiteID:14,Type:backAidText,Code:null,ParentId:0,InnerCode:342475,name:Notice to Contributors,ShortName:,SubName:,EnTitle:null,EnShortTitle:null,EnSubTitle:null,Level:0,BookId:9434932,AbstractCH:null,AbstractEN:null,KeyWords:null,EKeyWords:null,SubjectWords:null,LiteratureId:9435068,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:Y,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:null,XmlID:null,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2018-02-11 08:41:31.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2018-02-11 09:12:47.0,HitCount:0,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:0,DownCount:0,AuthorInfos:null,BookPublishDate:2017-06-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:Notice to Contributors,ISBN:978-7-5201-0911-6,BookTitle:International Security Studies Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017,BookStatus:6,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:Notice to Contributors,_RowNo:9
相关图书
引文
×