{"root":[{"id":2136007,"innercode":"132002000001","name":"一 引言"},{"id":2136056,"innercode":"132002000002","name":"二 关于从全球经营战略的角度分析跨国公司当地化的研究","children":[{"id":2136010,"innercode":"132002000002000001","name":"（一）波特的\u201C配置\u2014\u2014协调\u201D"},{"id":2136026,"innercode":"132002000002000002","name":"（二）帕拉哈拉德和多茨的\u201C一体化\u2014\u2014当地化框架\u201D理论"},{"id":2136042,"innercode":"132002000002000003","name":"（三）巴特利特等人的\u201C全球协调/一体化\u2014\u2014当地适应/差别化\u201D理论"},{"id":2136044,"innercode":"132002000002000004","name":"（四）莫里斯提出\u201C全球当地化\u201D概念"},{"id":2136055,"innercode":"132002000002000005","name":"（五）其他"}]},{"id":2136066,"innercode":"132002000003","name":"三 关于从\u201C混合型模式（Hybrid model）\u201D理论假说来分析跨国公司当地化的研究","children":[{"id":2136059,"innercode":"132002000003000001","name":"（一）\u201C混合型模式\u201D理论假说的核心"},{"id":2136061,"innercode":"132002000003000002","name":"（二）\u201C混合型模式\u201D理论假说的评价标准"},{"id":2136065,"innercode":"132002000003000003","name":"（三）\u201C混合型模式\u201D理论假说的意义"}]},{"id":2136082,"innercode":"132002000004","name":"四 从跨国公司人力资源的角度分析跨国公司当地化的研究","children":[{"id":2136069,"innercode":"132002000004000001","name":"（一）莫妮·泰耶的人才当地化过程中母公司外派雇员的两难心态<note>10476590</note>"},{"id":2136071,"innercode":"132002000004000002","name":"（二）日本学者吉原英树论倡导\u201C日本人和当地人共同的经营管理\u201D的当地化"},{"id":2136073,"innercode":"132002000004000003","name":"（三）关权论跨国公司的不同的人员关系造成了当地化程度的不同"},{"id":2136076,"innercode":"132002000004000004","name":"（四）藤野哲也关于跨国公司雇佣当地优秀人才四大动机的分析"},{"id":2136079,"innercode":"132002000004000005","name":"（五）高桥泰隆论用战前殖民时代的海外投资历史事例来透视日本人力资源的当地化的特质"},{"id":2136081,"innercode":"132002000004000006","name":"（六）稻村雄大论海外驻在人员与当地化之间的权衡关系"}]},{"id":2136091,"innercode":"132002000005","name":"五 有关跨国公司对华投资中的当地化问题研究","children":[{"id":2136085,"innercode":"132002000005000001","name":"（一）从全球化经营战略的角度分析跨国公司对中国的当地化问题"},{"id":2136088,"innercode":"132002000005000002","name":"（二）从公司治理的角度分析跨国公司对中国的当地化问题"},{"id":2136090,"innercode":"132002000005000003","name":"（三）从人力资源的角度分析跨国公司在中国的当地化问题"}]},{"id":2136093,"innercode":"132002000006","name":"五 总结性评论"}]}