{"root":[{"id":5505230,"innercode":"167683000001","name":"前言：案例研究的作用及价值","children":[{"id":5505219,"innercode":"167683000001000001","name":"1.王泽鉴的理论"},{"id":5505221,"innercode":"167683000001000002","name":"2.应重视案例研究的作用及价值"},{"id":5505227,"innercode":"167683000001000003","name":"3.关于案例的研究方法"},{"id":5505229,"innercode":"167683000001000004","name":"4.本书案例引用之说明"}]},{"id":5505246,"innercode":"167683000002","name":"一 人体捐献器官移植：一个关乎分配正义的权利冲突问题","children":[{"id":5505233,"innercode":"167683000002000001","name":"1.基本案情：人体捐献器官的分配机制"},{"id":5505235,"innercode":"167683000002000002","name":"2.法律问题：自然法（自然权利、自然秩序）→道德法（道德权利、道德秩序）→人定法（法定权利、法律秩序）的逐步过渡"},{"id":5505237,"innercode":"167683000002000003","name":"3.另一种思路：发挥医疗资源的最大化原则\u2014\u2014布洛克的观点"},{"id":5505239,"innercode":"167683000002000004","name":"4.最新进展：器官分配系统强制使用"},{"id":5505241,"innercode":"167683000002000005","name":"5.如何解决器官短缺问题：国家拟建立人体器官捐献基金解决器官捐献中的问题"},{"id":5505243,"innercode":"167683000002000006","name":"6.国内首部人体器官捐献地方性法规于2013年3月实施"},{"id":5505245,"innercode":"167683000002000007","name":"7.器官捐献的域外经验：全球推崇西班牙模式"}]},{"id":5505252,"innercode":"167683000003","name":"二 四川大凉山\u201C失依儿童\u201D的抚养权问题：习惯权利与法定权利的冲突","children":[{"id":5505249,"innercode":"167683000003000001","name":"1.基本案情：四川大凉山\u201C失依儿童\u201D的抚养权问题"},{"id":5505251,"innercode":"167683000003000002","name":"2.法律问题：习惯权利与法定权利的冲突"}]},{"id":5505260,"innercode":"167683000004","name":"三 黑龙江大庆银行抢劫案引发的问题：国家财产权和个人人身安全权相冲突的案例","children":[{"id":5505255,"innercode":"167683000004000001","name":"1.基本案情：黑龙江大庆银行抢劫案引发的问题"},{"id":5505257,"innercode":"167683000004000002","name":"2.法律问题：法律义务还是道德义务？国家财产权和个人人身安全权相冲突"},{"id":5505259,"innercode":"167683000004000003","name":"3.相关问题讨论：\u201C小悦悦被碾死案\u201D中见死不救引发的法律义务与道德义务的争论"}]},{"id":5505270,"innercode":"167683000005","name":"四 广西钦州\u201C抱养弃婴案\u201D引发的问题：抱养弃婴与讨回亲子抚养权相冲突的案例","children":[{"id":5505263,"innercode":"167683000005000001","name":"1.基本案情：广西钦州\u201C抱养弃婴案\u201D引发的问题"},{"id":5505265,"innercode":"167683000005000002","name":"2.法律问题：抱养弃婴行为与讨回亲子抚养权的冲突"},{"id":5505267,"innercode":"167683000005000003","name":"3.类似案例以及2013年河南兰考大火烧死7名孤儿和弃婴案"},{"id":5505269,"innercode":"167683000005000004","name":"4.2013年6月民政部等七部委发文禁止任何机构和个人私自收留弃婴"}]},{"id":5505278,"innercode":"167683000006","name":"五 山东济南银行储蓄引发的问题：公民储蓄权与银行执法权<note>11030088</note>及维权成本","children":[{"id":5505273,"innercode":"167683000006000001","name":"1.基本案情：山东济南银行储蓄引发的问题"},{"id":5505275,"innercode":"167683000006000002","name":"2.法律问题：银行执法权与公民储蓄权及维权成本"},{"id":5505277,"innercode":"167683000006000003","name":"3.类似案例：江西瑞安的银行储蓄案"}]},{"id":5505288,"innercode":"167683000007","name":"六 云南昆明\u201C弹钢琴案\u201D、北京\u201C弹古筝案\u201D和四川成都\u201C打麻将案\u201D引发的问题：公民休息权和公民娱乐权相冲突的案例","children":[{"id":5505281,"innercode":"167683000007000001","name":"1.基本案情一：云南昆明\u201C弹钢琴案\u201D"},{"id":5505283,"innercode":"167683000007000002","name":"2.基本案情二：北京\u201C弹古筝案\u201D"},{"id":5505285,"innercode":"167683000007000003","name":"3.基本案情三：四川成都\u201C打麻将案\u201D"},{"id":5505287,"innercode":"167683000007000004","name":"4.法律问题：公民休息权和公民娱乐权相冲突"}]},{"id":5505296,"innercode":"167683000008","name":"七 南京120急救中心主叫地址显示缺失引发的问题：公民性命权与隐私权相冲突的案例","children":[{"id":5505291,"innercode":"167683000008000001","name":"1.基本案情：南京120急救中心主叫地址显示缺失引发的问题"},{"id":5505293,"innercode":"167683000008000002","name":"2.法律问题：公民性命权与隐私权相冲突"},{"id":5505295,"innercode":"167683000008000003","name":"3.事件结果：110、119、122\u201C三台合一\u201D"}]},{"id":5505304,"innercode":"167683000009","name":"八 辽宁沈阳等各地交通法规中生命权、人身安全权和车辆通行权相冲突的案例","children":[{"id":5505299,"innercode":"167683000009000001","name":"1.基本案情：辽宁沈阳等各地交通法规中关于行人与机动车责任的规定"},{"id":5505301,"innercode":"167683000009000002","name":"2.法律问题：生命权、人身安全权和车辆通行权相冲突"},{"id":5505303,"innercode":"167683000009000003","name":"3.事件最终结果：《道路交通安全法》以10%的赔偿责任确定了无责任机动车一方的赔偿额"}]},{"id":5505312,"innercode":"167683000010","name":"九 广东一假释犯见义勇为牺牲引发的问题：公民政治权利与荣誉权相冲突的案例","children":[{"id":5505307,"innercode":"167683000010000001","name":"1.基本案情：广东一假释犯见义勇为牺牲引发的问题"},{"id":5505309,"innercode":"167683000010000002","name":"2.法律问题：公民政治权利与荣誉权相冲突"},{"id":5505311,"innercode":"167683000010000003","name":"3.延伸性法律问题：刑事犯罪人的民事权利保护问题"}]},{"id":5505324,"innercode":"167683000011","name":"十 新疆乌鲁木齐四家医院拒绝抢救急救病人致死案例引发的问题：急救病人的生命健康权与医院经营收益权相冲突的案例","children":[{"id":5505315,"innercode":"167683000011000001","name":"1.基本案情：新疆乌鲁木齐四家医院拒绝抢救急救病人致死案例引发的问题"},{"id":5505317,"innercode":"167683000011000002","name":"2.法律问题：急救病人的生命健康权与医院经营收益权相冲突"},{"id":5505319,"innercode":"167683000011000003","name":"3.记者调查：医疗费拖欠成为一个严重的全国性问题"},{"id":5505321,"innercode":"167683000011000004","name":"4.卫生部2013年工作要点中的\u201C先诊疗后付费\u201D引起的讨论"},{"id":5505323,"innercode":"167683000011000005","name":"5.最终结果：国家拟设立疾病应急救助基金"}]},{"id":5505348,"innercode":"167683000012","name":"十一 新闻采访中的\u201C暗拍\u201D引发的问题：记者的采访权与公民隐私权相冲突的事例","children":[{"id":5505327,"innercode":"167683000012000001","name":"1.基本案情：新闻采访中的\u201C暗拍\u201D引发的问题"},{"id":5505329,"innercode":"167683000012000002","name":"2.法律问题：记者的采访权与公民隐私权相冲突"},{"id":5505331,"innercode":"167683000012000003","name":"3.相关理论问题：记者的采访权、信息公开与公民知情权的关系"},{"id":5505333,"innercode":"167683000012000004","name":"4.关于\u201C偷拍\u201D\u201C偷录\u201D合法化的争论：最高人民法院关于民事证据规则的司法解释带来的新问题"},{"id":5505335,"innercode":"167683000012000005","name":"5.关于\u201C偷拍\u201D\u201C偷录\u201D作为证据的实际案例"},{"id":5505337,"innercode":"167683000012000006","name":"6.和\u201C偷拍\u201D相关的\u201C私人侦探\u201D问题"},{"id":5505339,"innercode":"167683000012000007","name":"7.手机偷拍引发的侵权问题"},{"id":5505341,"innercode":"167683000012000008","name":"8.国际社会对手机偷拍的应对策略"},{"id":5505343,"innercode":"167683000012000009","name":"9.窃听、偷拍、偷录可否成为一种侦查手段？\u2014\u2014香港的做法"},{"id":5505345,"innercode":"167683000012000010","name":"10.最高人民检察院考虑使用\u201C现代科技手段\u201D和秘密技术措施搜集腐败官员证据的合法性问题"},{"id":5505347,"innercode":"167683000012000011","name":"11.2013年9月北京警方查处非法生产销售使用窃听窃照器材"}]},{"id":5505356,"innercode":"167683000013","name":"十二 陕西一医院整形案和青岛一医院实习观摩女青年做人流引发的问题：医疗宣传和教学中的公民隐私权问题","children":[{"id":5505351,"innercode":"167683000013000001","name":"1.基本案情一：陕西一医院整形案引发的问题"},{"id":5505353,"innercode":"167683000013000002","name":"2.基本案情二：青岛一女青年做人流遭实习观摩引发的问题"},{"id":5505355,"innercode":"167683000013000003","name":"3.相关案例：四川成都航空中学树立一学生为优秀典型而侵犯其肖像权"}]},{"id":5505362,"innercode":"167683000014","name":"十三 浙江富阳古镇旅游引发的问题：住户的隐私权与游客的观光权相冲突的案例","children":[{"id":5505359,"innercode":"167683000014000001","name":"1.基本案情：浙江富阳古镇旅游引发的问题"},{"id":5505361,"innercode":"167683000014000002","name":"2.法律问题：住户的隐私权与游客的观光权相冲突"}]},{"id":5505370,"innercode":"167683000015","name":"十四 湖北武汉一起因生育权案件引发的问题：夫妻之间生育权相冲突的案例","children":[{"id":5505365,"innercode":"167683000015000001","name":"1.基本案情：湖北武汉一起因生育权引发的问题"},{"id":5505367,"innercode":"167683000015000002","name":"2.法律问题：夫妻之间生育权相冲突"},{"id":5505369,"innercode":"167683000015000003","name":"3.\u201C单身女性\u201D的生育权问题：吉林的法例与广东的案例"}]},{"id":5505376,"innercode":"167683000016","name":"十五 湖北武汉一高校检查学生公寓引发的问题：公寓不被闯入权与公寓管理权相冲突的案例","children":[{"id":5505373,"innercode":"167683000016000001","name":"1.基本案情：湖北武汉一高校检查学生公寓引发的问题"},{"id":5505375,"innercode":"167683000016000002","name":"2.法律问题：公寓不被闯入权与公寓管理权相冲突"}]},{"id":5505382,"innercode":"167683000017","name":"十六 陕北绥德老汉肖像权被侵犯引发的问题：肖像不当使用的案例","children":[{"id":5505379,"innercode":"167683000017000001","name":"1.基本案情：陕北绥德老汉肖像权被侵犯引发的问题"},{"id":5505381,"innercode":"167683000017000002","name":"2.法律问题及判决结果：肖像不当使用"}]},{"id":5505388,"innercode":"167683000018","name":"十七 北京微博第一案引发的问题：言论自由的限度","children":[{"id":5505385,"innercode":"167683000018000001","name":"1.基本案情：北京微博第一案引发的问题"},{"id":5505387,"innercode":"167683000018000002","name":"2.法律问题：言论自由的限度"}]},{"id":5505396,"innercode":"167683000019","name":"十八 《精神卫生法》中的问题：精神病患者的自愿治疗权与公众安全权的冲突","children":[{"id":5505391,"innercode":"167683000019000001","name":"1.基本案情：《精神卫生法》终结了\u201C被精神病\u201D的问题"},{"id":5505393,"innercode":"167683000019000002","name":"2.相关案例：浙江省、江西省和北京市三例精神病人危害公众安全被法院判决强制医疗案例"},{"id":5505395,"innercode":"167683000019000003","name":"3.法律问题：精神病患者的自愿治疗权与公众安全权的冲突"}]},{"id":5505402,"innercode":"167683000020","name":"十九 陕西勉县安乐死案引发新的讨论：人的生存权利与身体以及生命处置权利的冲突","children":[{"id":5505399,"innercode":"167683000020000001","name":"1.基本案情：陕西勉县安乐死案引发新的讨论"},{"id":5505401,"innercode":"167683000020000002","name":"2.法律问题：人的生存权利与身体以及生命处置权利的冲突"}]},{"id":5505408,"innercode":"167683000021","name":"二十 商标权与商号权之间的权利冲突","children":[{"id":5505405,"innercode":"167683000021000001","name":"1.基本案情：\u201C立邦涂料案\u201D与\u201C龙茂商标案\u201D"},{"id":5505407,"innercode":"167683000021000002","name":"2.法律问题：商标权与商号权之间的权利冲突"}]}]}