Table3 Subjective Subindexes by Region

当前位置：首页 > 图表库

图表库

图片名称： Table3 Subjective Subindexes by Region |

所属图书：中国城市生活质量报告（2017）

出版时间： 2017年12月

Conclusions and Enlightenments of the Quality of Life in Chinese City

6.1 Narrowing contrast between subjective and objective indexes，and high regionality

Table 1 lists the five subindexes of the subjective and the objective indexes，along with their changes in 2012-2017.

Table 1 Subjective and Objective Subindexes （2012-2017）
Index		2017	2016	2015	2014	2013	2012
Subjective satisfaction index	Subjective index of living standard	61.34	60.44	60.07	54.32	52.51	51.28
	Subjective index of living costs	38.94	39.74	38.94	31.81	31.22	28.91
	Subjective index of human capital	61.80	62.20	61.73	58.98	58.89	59.42
	Subjective index of social security	58.05	60.66	60.47	57.87	56.64	59.19
	Subjective index of living experience*	52.52	56.05	55.66	54.88	55.07	55.63
Objective index	Objective index of living standard	52.86	50.07	59.83	68.06	63.39	56.28
	Objective index of living cost	57.17	58.74	54.58	53.84	58.67	56.10
	Objective index of human capital	56.92	56.98	57.34	57.33	57.78	57.66
	Objective index of social security	50.49	50.43	51.26	54.66	55.26	50.85
	Objective index of living experience	57.49	57.54	56.17	55.57	53.67	51.89
*In 2017，the index is substituted with the subjective index of health conditions.

Table1 Subjective and Objective Subindexes （2012-2017）

It was found that from 2012 and especially from 2013 to 2016，the subjective subindexes had generally remained stable and slightly improved，while the objective subindexes had dropped significantly. It was therefore concluded that the subjective indexes were in obvious contrast with the objective indexes. According to the 2017 survey results however，such contrast seems to have narrowed. From the perspective of subindexes，except for the new subindexes of health conditions which cannot be compared to the past，and the subjective and objective indexes of living standard which have risen slightly，all the other subjective and objective subindexe has somewhat declined.^[1]In 2016，the living standard subjective index was 10.37 higher than the objective index，while in 2017，it is 8.48 higher. In view of such facts，it can be concluded that the contrast between the subjective and the objective indexes still exists，but is narrowing.

In 2017，both the subjective and the objective indexes，as well as their subindexes，have exhibited some regional characteristics. To be specific，in the past，the subjective indexes were high in the east and low in the west. This year however，similar to that of 2016，the indexes of the West continue to improve. Now the subjective index of the West is the highest，followed by the East and then the Centre. As for the objective indexes，same as before，the index of East China is still the highest，and that of the Centre the lowest （See Table 2）.

Table2 Subjective and Objective Indexes by Region

Table 2 Subjective and Objective Indexes by Region
Index	Region	2017	2016	2015	2014	2013	2012
Subjective Index	East	54.58	55.74	55.71	51.90	51.44	51.44
	Centre	54.30	55.75	55.50	51.14	50.65	50.66
	West	55.09	55.92	54.76	51.06	50.39	50.24
Objective index	East	56.73	56.43	56.93	59.60	59.59	57.46
	Centre	52.89	52.84	53.80	54.88	55.57	51.90
	West	53.97	53.71	54.48	55.88	55.27	52.26

Table2 Subject

上一页下一页 第/11页跳转 不分页阅读