您现在所在的位置：比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）
| 书 名： | 比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑） | ||||
| 英 文 名： | COMPARATIVE POLITICS STUDIES No.14 | ||||
| 作 者： | 李路曲 主编;上海师范大学《比较政治学研究》编辑部 | ||||
| I S B N： | 978-7-5201-3612-9 | ||||
| 关 键 词： | 比较政治学 文集 | ||||
| 出版时间： | 2018年09月 | ||||
中文摘要
随着国家间交往的日益增多，国家之间甚至地区之间的比较已经进入人们的日常生活，人们需要通过比较来认识事物之间的关联性，从与他者的比较中来确定自己的属性。在政治生活中，通过比较来认识各国尤其是本国的权力与权利特征、民主政治和国家建设的质量、发展模式的优长和缺陷等。总之，我们的生活已经离不开比较！
上海师范大学比较政治研究中心致力于比较研究，致力于中国的比较政治学的发展。它成立于2013年，以上海师范大学为依托，整合校内外、国内外相关领域的研究资源，致力于比较政治学理论、方法以及国别比较研究；定期举办比较政治学相关学术研讨会和高端学术讲座；定期出版学术刊物《比较政治学研究》。
《比较政治学研究》为政治学研究者提供公开的学术交流与争鸣园地，诚邀相关议题学者共同探讨比较政治学，以促进学科繁荣和进步。本刊的策划与出版，融思想性与前沿性为一体，以比较政治学为特色和重点，以专业化和国际化的视角确保刊物的学术质量、学术风格和学术使命，致力于解读纷繁的国际政治现实，在对比研究中提炼共通性的分析工具，以期为国家政治发展提供参照的最优尺度。
正所谓“独行快，众行远”。期冀与学界同人共同携手促进中国比较政治研究的发展与繁荣。
文章列表
新制度主义政治学不仅应当从自身学科的范式转换和新旧嬗变角度加以考察，而且其产生和发展历程还处于社会科学演进及各学科交融的脉络之中，多学科与多源流的分析视野有助于理解新制度主义在推进前沿发展、延展研究范围、更新研究方法方面的有益成果。现实主义取向的理性与经验的划分、实证主义取向的解释与诠释的划分、个体主义取向的结构与能动的划分构成了社会科学的研究背景，并在塑造新制度主义政治学形态和格局的同时为其提供了动力。通过考察经济学、社会学与政治学中新旧制度主义路径的演变历程，以及新制度主义四个主要流派在政治科学中的确立过程，可以就新制度主义政治学的议题深化、理论建构与方法更新进行跟踪及评价，并对其发展前景做出整体把握。
,AbstractEN:New institutionalism in political science should not only be investigated from the perspective of the paradigm shift and the changing characters inside its discipline，its origin and development are within the evolution courses of social science and the interdisciplinary coupling.The multiple disciplines and headstreams contributes to understand the achievement of new institutionalism on advancing frontier，extending range，and updating method. The realist oriented division of reason and experience，the positivist division of explanation and interpretation，and the individualist oriented division of structure and agency constitute the background in social science，which also shape and provide impetus on the configuration of new institutionalism. Through investigating the transformation of old and new institutionalism of economy，sociology and political science，and the establishment of new institutionalism in political science，it can track and assess issue deepening，theory construction，and methodological renew of this approach，and grasp integrally on alliance building and agenda setting.
,KeyWords:82900,31407,82938,303783,EKeyWords:391207,84339,106652,469423,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526128,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_001,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:45.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:62,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526143,DownCount:10,AuthorInfos:{"马雪松":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"马雪松，政治学博士，吉林大学行政学院政治学系副主任，教授，博士生导师，研究方向为比较政治学、新制度主义理论与方法。
"},"Ma Xuesong":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:社会科学中的新制度主义政治学：一项学科史考察,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:社会科学中的新制度主义政治学：一项学科史考察,_RowNo:3现代比较政治研究以世界各国实现现代性的途径为问题核心，通过比较方法在“共时性”因果分析与“历时性”次序组合之间取得平衡结果，寻找与价值关联相一致的发展之路。在这个研究逻辑的推动下，比较政治学理论研究具有了同社会科学研究一致的知识背景和问题基础。相应地，比较政治理论研究围绕着确立现代性的核心问题，加强了微观个体行为与宏观历史结构之间的联系，出现了宏观与微观理论取向的融合态势。现代比较政治学的逻辑演化有助于中国比较政治研究定位核心研究问题，并为立基于中国经验，确立有中国特色的发展道路的理论探索提供支持。
,AbstractEN:Modern comparative political research takes the establishments of modernity as the hard core of research program.By comparing the equilibrium results of“synchronic”causal analysis and“diachronic”sequential combinations，modern comparative studies try to find out the proper paths of development which consistent with specific social values.This logic helps the theoretical approaches of comparative politics possess the common research question and strengthen linkage among the previous Macro approaches and the Micro ones.In a word，the synthesis of approaches emerges in modern comparative political research.Obviously，identifying the core questions and realizing the synthesis of approaches may provide theoretical indications to Chinese comparative political research on which the Chinese modern development experience as the empirical foundation.
,KeyWords:42676,386008,469424,EKeyWords:40960,469425,469426,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526148,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_002,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:46.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:13,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526158,DownCount:7,AuthorInfos:{"邢瑞磊":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"邢瑞磊，武汉大学政治与公共管理学院副教授，武汉大学经济外交研究中心研究员。
"},"Xing RuiLei":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:宏观与微观的融合：比较政治学研究路径的逻辑调适与演化,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:宏观与微观的融合：比较政治学研究路径的逻辑调适与演化,_RowNo:4社会科学方法论中定性与定量“两种传承”的争论长期存在，但立足同一议题下对两种方法进行对比的文章并不多见。近年来，欧洲极右翼政党的兴起愈加受到学界的广泛关注。这一现实世界的重大问题，不仅使人们重思经典理论，同时为研究方法的比较提供了一个很好的平台。本文在既有研究的基础之上，提出了五个有关欧洲极右翼政党崛起的假设，并分别用定性比较分析与逻辑斯蒂回归两种方法对假设进行检验。结果显示，清晰集定性比较分析给出了四条因果路径，而逻辑斯蒂回归并没有发挥其优势。因此，在中等规模样本的研究中，定性比较分析在识别必要条件以及条件组合具有独特优势。同时值得注意的是，两种方法蕴含不同的逻辑与原理，二者并无优劣之分，其使用视特定议题而论。
,AbstractEN:There has been a constant debate over“a tale of two cultures”of social science methodology，but it is not common to find the two methods based on the same issue.In recent years，the rise of the radical-right political parties in Europe has drawn more and more attention from the scholars，which providing a good platform for the comparison of two methods.The results show that csQCA gives four causal paths，and logistic regression does not play its advantages.Therefore，qualitative comparative analysis has unique advantages in identifying sufficient / necessary conditions and configurational combinations in small and medium sample studies.At the same time，different logic and principles，they have no distinction between merits and demerits，issues and subjects tell us which to choose.
,KeyWords:81012,467892,469427,469428,EKeyWords:469429,469430,343070,469431,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526167,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_003,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:46.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:15,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526181,DownCount:8,AuthorInfos:{"释启鹏":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"释启鹏，中国人民大学国际关系学院博士研究生，研究方向为发展研究、比较历史分析；
"},"陆屹州":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"陆屹州，中国人民大学国际关系学院博士研究生，研究方向为政治心理与政治行为、政治传播、社会科学方法论。
"},"Shi Qipeng":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Lu Yizhou":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:“两种传承”的实证检视：以欧洲极右翼政党兴起为例,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:“两种传承”的实证检视：以欧洲极右翼政党兴起为例,_RowNo:5国家中心理论范式在国家—社会关系基础上讨论“相互关联的两端”中的“国家”，认为国家是具有独立意志的组织体，而不是“社会冲突的舞台”，也不是“阶级统治的工具”。国家自主性经历了从“分殊”到“嵌入”的理论变革，分殊式国家自主性主张“凌驾于社会之上”的国家，凸显国家与社会在组织特质上的差异对立，并以国家与社会主导力量的较量和政策过程中的相互博弈作为确证；而嵌入式国家自主性则在国家与社会分殊基础上，考察国家对社会的嵌入，强调“社会中的国家”，认为国家的嵌入式自主能够有效推动经济社会发展。国家自主性的理论变革为思考社会政治实践开辟出新进路，“分殊式自主”的国家理论与“以社会制衡权力”的民主实践有共识性理论基础，而由“嵌入式自主”生发出的“国家与社会协同”则为理解治理实践的展开提供了知识支持。
,AbstractEN:On the basic of state-society relationship，state-centered paradigm claimed that state was an organizational entity with independent will，instead of a stage of social conflict or a tool of class domination.State autonomy theory changed from “differentiated” to “embedded”，and the differentiated state autonomy theory asserted that the state，“above the society”，was different from society in the organizational structure，which was evidence-based the contests between state and leading forces in the society and in the policy process，meanwhile the embedded state autonomy theory advocated that the state，“State in Society”，was differentiated but embedded the society，which can effectively promote economic and social development.The change of state autonomy theory opened the new paths for understanding the social political practice.The differentiated autonomy theory had the research consensus with the democratic activities of restricting power through society.However，state and society synergy，which was evolved from the embedded autonomy theory，provided the knowledge for understanding the governance practices.
,KeyWords:349922,469432,82950,4916,EKeyWords:469433,469434,138363,112038,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526186,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_004,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:46.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:13,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526198,DownCount:7,AuthorInfos:{"曹胜":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"曹胜，中国行政管理学会副研究员。
"},"Cao Sheng":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:国家自主性：从“分殊制衡”到“嵌入协同”——理论变革与实践意义,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:国家自主性：从“分殊制衡”到“嵌入协同”——理论变革与实践意义,_RowNo:6经过不断的理论发展，达尔丰富并发展了一套程序民主的理论。这一理论包括了平等投票、有效参与、开明理解、民众对议程的最终控制和包容性等5个标准。在这5个标准的基础上，达尔提出了7个假设，即集体有决策要求，决策分为议程设定和最终决策两个阶段，服务决策的人做决策，同等正当要求同等份额，偏好同等正当，个人是自己利益的最好判断者，基本公平。根据这7个假设，5个标准，达尔设计了狭义的程序民主、有着民众的程序民主、有关民众并考虑到议程的完全程序民主，完全的程序民主等4种程序民主的模式。达尔的程序民主理论有其现实意义，但也包含了理想成分。
,AbstractEN:Robert Dahl advanced a system of theory on procedural democracy，which contains five standards：equal elections，effective participation，enlightened understanding，control of the agenda and inclusive.On the basis of 5 standards，Dahl advanced 7 assumptions：collective decision-making requirements，decision-making is divided into two stages of agenda-setting and decision-making，people who make decisions obey decisions；equally legitimate demands should deserve equal share；preferences equally legitimate，the perfect state of equal qualifications exist，the individual is his own the best interests of the judge.According to the 5 standards and 7 assumptions，Dahl defines four models of democracy：democratic process that is a narrow procedural democracy，about people，about people and taking into account the full program agenda for democracy and democratic procedures.Dahl's procedural democracy is of great value for the practice，and includes ideal content.
,KeyWords:469435,79700,29559,EKeyWords:469436,79703,105125,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526203,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_005,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:46.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:11,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526213,DownCount:10,AuthorInfos:{"牟硕":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"牟硕，政治学博士，天津师范大学马克思主义学院讲师。
"},"Mu Shuo":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:达尔的程序民主理论探新,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:达尔的程序民主理论探新,_RowNo:720世纪50年代，印度摆脱了英国殖民统治，建立了代议制。然而数十年来，印度既未能形成完全等同于西方式的政治发展模式，也未能走社会主义道路，而是将社会平权运动容纳于已有的自由民主和本土政治文化中。基于后发国家与早发国家在政治、经济、社会结构方面的差异、以及发展时期和发展阶段的不同，二者呈现出不同的发展序列。印度的政治实践表明，遵循本国国情，寻求一条适合自身的政治发展道路，才是后发国家的根本出路。
,AbstractEN:In 1950s，India gained independence from British colonial rule，and established its representative institutions.However，Political development in India did not develop into western model nor socialist model over decades.In fact，India includes social equality movement inexisting liberal democracy system and local political culture.On account of different political，economic and social structure conditions between developed countries and backward countries，along with diverse development period and development stage，political development present a different development sequence.Political practice in India demonstrate that a suitable development path in accordance with national conditions is the fundamental way out for backward countries.
,KeyWords:3345,4096,6499,6147,469437,EKeyWords:3353,4101,59019,45327,469438,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526220,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_006,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:46.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:8,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526230,DownCount:5,AuthorInfos:{"谭融":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"谭融，南开大学周恩来政府管理学院教授，博士生导师；
"},"王子涵":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"王子涵，南开大学周恩来政府管理学院政治学博士研究生。
"},"Tan Rong":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Wang Zihan":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:论印度政治发展道路的探寻,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:论印度政治发展道路的探寻,_RowNo:8考察地区一体化、立宪主义和国内政治发展之间的关联性，已成为学界当前研究的热点之一。地区一体化的深入发展，带来外部市场准入的变化，这些变化通过对一国的政治经济联盟的影响，改变执政联盟对于财富分配、政治结构、个人权利等制度性变革的预期，并最终推动政治发展。缅甸的地区一体化实践为研究该国的政治发展提供了样本。地区一体化重构了该国精英和大众的关系及决策体制，也深刻影响了精英阶层的嬗变和政治共识的形成。大众联盟的成长正极力改变缅甸的权力结构。
,AbstractEN:Study on the relations between regional integration，constitutionalism and domestic political development has become one of the most important issue within the current academic research.With the development of regional integration，great changes in external market access will generate significance for political development.The development of regional integration will bring changes of market access，which will change the distribution of wealth，political structures and individual rights through the impacts of political and economic alliances .All these changes will ultimately promote political development.Regional integration of Myanmar provides an example for study on its political development. Regional integration reconstructed its elite-mass relations and decision-making system，and also gives a profound impact on the formation and evolution of the elite political consensus.Growth of public coalition are strongly alter the power structure in Myanmar，
,KeyWords:66429,172625,469439,4096,EKeyWords:20271,57710,469440,4101,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526237,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_007,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:47.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:9,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526253,DownCount:7,AuthorInfos:{"赵银亮":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"赵银亮，上海师范大学哲学与法政学院教授，法学博士，政治学博士后；
"},"岳晓璐":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"岳晓璐，上海师范大学哲学与法政学院硕士研究生，研究方向为比较政治学。
"},"Zhao Yinliang":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Yue Xiaolu":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:地区一体化、立宪主义与缅甸政治发展,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:地区一体化、立宪主义与缅甸政治发展,_RowNo:9非对称协商是指在参与者的协商过程中，占资源优势地位的参与者能对协商结果产生更大的影响。马来西亚的执政联盟主要是指马华印联盟和国阵联盟。该国的执政联盟为妥善地解决联盟成员党的政治分歧，实现联盟的共同利益，在该国的公共政策、议会竞选、内阁职务分配等方面开展了非对称协商。执政联盟非对称协商的特点是参与协商的政党数量较多，巫统在协商中发挥着主导作用，联盟的内阁职务分配逐渐以竞选结果为标准，联盟的协商向维护社会民众利益转变。执政联盟的非对称协商扩大了联盟政治团结的范围，推动了联盟获得国会的多数议席，也促进了联盟的成员党分享该国的执政权，提高了联盟的运作效率。
,AbstractEN:Asymmetric negotiation refers to that during the negotiation of participants，the participants in the dominant position of resources can have a greater impact on the negotiation results.The ruling coalition of Malaysia mainly refers to the Wu-hua-yin coalition and the Barisan National coalition.The ruling coalition of the country in order to properly resolve the political differences of the coalition members and realize the common interests of the coalition，therefore，the ruling coalition conducts asymmetric consultation in the aspects of country's public policy，parliamentary election and cabinet position allocation.The characteristics of asymmetric consultation in the ruling coalition are that there are a large number of parties involved in the consultation，and UMNO plays the leading role in the negotiation.The cabinet position assignment of the coalition is gradually based on the results of the election，and the negotiation of the coalition turns to safeguard the interests of the public.Asymmetric consultation of the ruling coalition has expanded the scope of the coalition's political unity，promoted the coalition to obtain a majority of seats in the parliament，and promoted the member parties of the coalition to share the country's ruling power and improve the alliance's operational efficiency.
,KeyWords:3400,5403,469441,96262,EKeyWords:3408,6428,469442,96264,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526259,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_008,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:47.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:13,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526270,DownCount:10,AuthorInfos:{"李江":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"李江，武汉大学政治与公共管理学院2016级中外政治制度专业博士研究生；
"},"储建国":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"储建国，政治学博士，武汉大学政治与公共管理学院教授，博士生导师。
"},"Li Jiang":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Chu Jianguo":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:马来西亚执政联盟的非对称协商研究,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:马来西亚执政联盟的非对称协商研究,_RowNo:10对于任何一个现代民族国家，民族共同体危机都是最严重的危机。民族共同体建设无论是从原生论的族群民族主义建构国家，还是从建构论的公民民族主义国家建构民族，抑或兼而有之，既是一个复杂的理论问题，也是一个复杂的政治实践问题。哈萨克斯坦独立后，其民族共同体建设是在苏联对哈萨克族的“民族”建构基础上的再建构：一方面从原生论族群民族主义出发，通过“哈萨克化”建构哈萨克族的哈萨克斯坦共和国，另一方面从建构论公民民族主义出发，通过“哈萨克斯坦化”建构新的包含所有哈萨克斯坦公民的“哈萨克斯坦人”。但是，哈萨克斯坦民族共同体建设还面临理论困境、实践挑战及对苏联的路径依赖三大未解难题，未来能否最终走出这些困境，将有赖于其政治家的政治实践艺术。
,AbstractEN:National community crisis is most serious for any national state. Constructing the state from the primordial ethnic nationalism or building the nation from the constructive civic nationalism state or both is not only a complex theoretical but also a complicated political practice issue for any nation-building.After the independence of Kazakhstan，its nation-building is a reconstructing process based on the“nation”construction and deconstruction for Kazakhs by the Pre-soviet，which including constructing the Republic of Kazakhstan from primordial ethnic nationalism by Kazakhization on the one hand and constructing a civic Kazakhstani nation by Kazakhstanization on the otherhand.However，there are so many theoretical dilemmas，practical challenges and path-dependence from the Pre-soviet.So it is still very uncertain whether the Kazakhstan can make success in the future.
,KeyWords:3885,308001,383004,469443,EKeyWords:3887,137982,425105,469444,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526278,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_009,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:47.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:9,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526295,DownCount:8,AuthorInfos:{"彭庆军":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"彭庆军，中南民族大学公共管理学院副教授。
"},"Peng Qingjun":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:哈萨克斯坦民族共同体的建构与重构,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:哈萨克斯坦民族共同体的建构与重构,_RowNo:11本文以土耳其新宪法为依据，采用马修·S.舒加特（Mattew Soberg Shugart）、约翰·M.凯里（John M.Carey）等学者提出的量化测量方法并加以适当修正，形成量表评估土耳其总统的权力：即总统权力不仅要衡量其正式权力，还要考量其非正式权力；前者取决于宪法设计中的权力归属，后者则与政党制度、权力制衡等政治过程有关。并与美国、俄罗斯、法国和韩国等代表性的总统制国家进行比较。结果显示，土耳其总统享有极大的立法性权力和非立法性权力，呈现出与俄罗斯超级总统制类似的特点；土耳其新宪法设计中缺少对总统强有力的制衡机制。研究表明，影响民主的发展不在于实行的是总统制还是议会制，关键在于制度设计时能否融入权力制衡机制。
,AbstractEN:Turkey's controversial referendum showed that Turkish regime would changed to presidentialism，leading to a lot of criticism.In the context of AKP's dominance，this paper，based on the new constitution of Turkey，assesses and the Turkish president's power using the quantitative methods put forward by Shugart，which were revised.In addition，it is compared with other typical presidential systems’ presidents such as United States，Russia，France and South Korea.The results show that the Turkish president enjoys extensive legislative power and non-legislative power，which is similar to the Russian hyper-presidentialism.Besides，the new constitution lacks effective checks and balances for the president，overshadowing democracy consolidation.
,KeyWords:33271,469445,27919,82894,EKeyWords:33273,469446,73574,220508,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526299,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_010,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:47.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:22,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526312,DownCount:10,AuthorInfos:{"徐国冲":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"徐国冲，厦门大学公共事务学院副教授；
"},"霍龙霞":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"霍龙霞，厦门大学公共事务学院研究生。
"},"Xu Guochong":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""},"Huo Longxia":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:比较视野下的土耳其总统制研究,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:比较视野下的土耳其总统制研究,_RowNo:12民主化研究中较为普遍的看法是，由于族际信任与包容的缺失、国家权力的族群化、族群性政党的形成以及族群冲突的重新激活，族群分裂社会很难实现平稳民主转型。然而，作为一个曾因种族矛盾走向内战边缘的国家，南非从种族对抗到民族和解的转型奇迹对这种看法提出了挑战。分析发现，政治精英的理性引导，渐进的转型速度，转型过程中各方的参与，武装力量的有效整合，新政治契约的达成，转型正义的实现，以及理性的制度设计是南非避免大规模政治冲突，实现和平转型的内在逻辑，也是其他族群分裂社会走出转型陷阱的他山之石和路径借鉴。
,AbstractEN:Peaceful democratic transition in ethnically divided societies will be challenged by a numbers of factors which include the lack of trust among ethnic groups，the monopoly of state power by a single ethnic group，ethnical political parties and possible ethnical conflicts precipitated by the breakdown of authoritarian regimes.However，the peaceful transition from apartheid to democracy of South Africa shows that，even though it is rather demanding，peaceful democratic transition in divided societies is not impossible.If all political actors have access for bargaining for new political rules which determines the allocation of power in the future during an open and gradual transition，a democracy agreed by all will take shape.The miracle of South Africa transition has valuable lessons for other countries suffering from ethnic conflict on one hand，and broadens the theoretical horizon of democratization study on the other.
,KeyWords:448609,114105,469447,67263,EKeyWords:469448,469449,4115,469450,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526318,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_011,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:47.0,ModifyUser:null,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:14,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526331,DownCount:7,AuthorInfos:{"马正义":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"马正义，政治学博士，广州大学台湾研究院讲师，研究方向为比较政治与比较民主化。
"},"Ma Zhengyi":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:族群分裂社会何以实现平稳民主转型：以南非为例,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:族群分裂社会何以实现平稳民主转型：以南非为例,_RowNo:13在新时代下，中国比较政治学研究在价值取向上既要拥有世界视野，又要彰显中国关怀；在研究对象上既要深入研究西方发达国家的发展经验，又要注重对非西方发展中国家国情的研究；在资源汲取上既要善于认真总结中国自身改革开放40年来的成功经验，又要充分挖掘中国优秀的历史遗产和文化传统；在研究策略上既要注重理论阐述的精细化，又要注重研究方法的科学化。
,AbstractEN:In the New Era，The Comparative Politics Studies in China should not only have a global vision in terms of value but also should demonstrate the concern for China；On research object，we must study the national conditions of developing countries as well as the development experience of western countries.In terms of resource assimilation，it is necessary to sum up the successful experience of China's 40 years of Reform and Opening up，and to fully explore Chinese outstanding historical heritage and cultural traditions.In the research strategy，we must not only focus on the refinement of the theory but also pay attention to the scientific method of research.
,KeyWords:102913,82944,36275,107913,469451,350433,EKeyWords:102915,220508,38862,161820,469452,350434,SubjectWords:,LiteratureId:10526336,Fileref:null,OrderFlag:0,IsLeaf:N,PubDate:null,FindDate:null,IssueDate:null,DocType:null,ProductSeries:null,Doi:null,InstanceID:0,MinNodeSearch:Y,XmlID:b120190102X20185597015_012,Prop1:null,Prop2:null,Prop3:null,prop4:null,AddUser:wanghan,AddTime:2019-01-22 16:30:47.0,ModifyUser:Admin,ModifyTime:2023-09-26 23:29:31.0,HitCount:34,ShowType:putong,LogoID:0,PdfID:10526352,DownCount:7,AuthorInfos:{"杨端程":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":null,"Blurb":"杨端程，中国人民大学国际关系学院政治学系2018级博士研究生。笔者在写作本文过程中，得到李路曲教授、景跃进教授、马雪松教授、高春芽教授、谭融教授、程同顺教授、包刚升副教授、吕同舟讲师、陈玮讲师以及季程远博士等师长的帮助，笔者在此向上述学者表示感谢。
"},"Yang Duancheng":{"Address":null,"Affiliation":null,"Email":null,"Role":null,"Photo":"","Blurb":""}},BookPublishDate:2018-09-01 00:00:00.0,SearchTitle:“比较政治学的新发展”暨第七届比较政治学论坛会议综述,ISBN:978-7-5201-3612-9,BookTitle:比较政治学研究（2018年第1辑，总第14辑）,BookStatus:7,AllowDownload:Y,BookVersionNum:null,researchorg:null,CopyRightDate:null,ExcellentPeriod:null,PrizeLevel:null,IsExcellence:null,ContentClass:null,IsDisabled:N,SearchTitle_2:“比较政治学的新发展”暨第七届比较政治学论坛会议综述,_RowNo:14
京公网安备11010202003507号